Hughes began (The Hawk in the Rain, 1957; Lupercal, 1960) as an elemental poet of power; he was inchoate, but fruitfully aware both of the brute force of creation and of the natural world. Then:he began to assume a mantic role; he has now turned into (Crow, 1970) a pretentious, coffee-table poet, a mindless celebrant of instinct.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- This critic claims Hughes started as a powerful poet of nature but became pretentious and focused only on instinct later.
- In plain terms
- Hughes changed from good to bad poetry.
- What can you take from it?
- Artists evolve but may lose depth.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Does an artist owe growth?
- How do you judge style changes?
Another view
This is a subjective opinion not shared by all critics.
More from Ted Hughes
No death outside my immediate family has left me feeling more bereft. No death in my lifetime has hurt poets more. He was a tower of tenderness and strength, a…
Permalink to quote #8 The sky split apart in malice Stars rattled like pans on a shelf Crow shat on Buckingham Palace God pissed Himself.
Permalink to quote #10 It took the whole of Creation To produce my foot, my each feather: Now I hold Creation in my foot. Or fly up, and revolve it all slowly - I kill where I please…
Permalink to quote #7
Related quotes
The poetical tendency of the present and of the preceding century has been divided in a manner singularly curious. One loud and conspicuous faction of bards, g…
H. P. LovecraftH. P. Lovecraft quote #1 On peut citer de mauvais vers, quand ils sont d'un grand poete.
Pierre Choderlos de LaclosPierre Choderlos de Laclos quote #2 I, too, dislike it: there are things that are important beyond all this fiddle. Reading it, however, with a perfect contempt for it, one discovers in it after …
Marianne MooreMarianne Moore quote #6