Readers are less and less seen as mere non-writers, the subhuman 'other' or flawed derivative of the author; the lack of a pen is no longer a shameful mark of secondary status but a positively enabling space, just as within every writer can be seen to lurk, as a repressed but contaminating antithesis, a reader.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- The status of readers has shifted from passive observers to active participants equal to writers.
- In plain terms
- Readers are now seen as equals to writers.
- What can you take from it?
- Value reader participation.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Who owns a text?
- Is a reader a writer?
Another view
It overlooks traditional authorial authority.
More from Terry Eagleton
All propaganda or popularization involves a putting of the complex into the simple, but such a move is instantly deconstructive. For if the complex can be put …
Permalink to quote #10 Ideology is like halitosis - it is what the other fellow has.
Permalink to quote #12 Chaucer was a class traitor Shakespeare hated the mob Donne sold out a bit later Sidney was a nob.
Permalink to quote #9
Related quotes
If a secret history of books could be written, and the author's private thoughts and meanings noted down alongside of his story, how many insipid volumes would…
William Makepeace ThackerayWilliam Makepeace Thackeray quote #37 A writer is, after all, only half his book. The other half is the reader and from the reader the writer learns.
P. L. TraversP. L. Travers quote #2 To be identified with the public is the divine gift of the best-sellers in popular Romance and, no doubt, in popular realism. E. M. Forster once spoke of the n…
V. S PritchettV. S Pritchett quote #11