Now, practically all reviewers have academic aspirations. The people from the universities are used to a captive audience, but the literary journalist has to please his audience.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Most reviewers come from academic backgrounds where they are used to captive audiences. Literary journalists differ because they must actively please their readers.
- In plain terms
- Academic reviewers expect attention while journalists must work to keep readers.
- What can you take from it?
- Reviewers face different pressures based on their audience obligations.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Does audience matter to criticism?
- Is academic review biased?
Another view
Not all academic reviewers are used to captive audiences.
More from V. S Pritchett
Wilson was not, in the academic sense, a scholar or historian. He was an enormous reader, one of those readers who are perpetually on the scent from book to bo…
Permalink to quote #18 It's very important to feel foreign. I was born in England, but when I'm being a writer, everyone in England is foreign to me.
Permalink to quote #20 Great artists are always far-seeing. They easily avoid the big stumbling blocks of fact. They rely on their own simplicity and vision. It is fact-fetichism tha…
Permalink to quote #17
Related quotes
It is a fallacy to think that carping is the strongest form of criticism: the important work begins after the artist's mistakes have been pointed out, and the …
Wilfrid SheedWilfrid Sheed quote #40 I hate journalists. There is nothing in them but tittering jeering emptiness. They have all made what Dante calls the Great Refusal, - that is they have ceased…
William Butler YeatsWilliam Butler Yeats quote #4 I loved writing about things when I was excited about them. It's not fun writing about bad movies. I used to think it was bad for my skin. It's painful writing…
Pauline KaelPauline Kael quote #6