For now, I'm supposing that all movements are equal, which they're not, except in this respect: that none of them gives a damn about artists beyond their immediate utility. Good movements will use a writer just as ruthlessly as bad ones; since they all fancy they have better things to do than worry about one man's artistic survival.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- All political movements prioritize utility over artistic value, treating writers as tools rather than individuals.
- In plain terms
- Movements use writers for their own ends without caring about the artists' survival.
- What can you take from it?
- Expect to be used by movements rather than supported by them.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- How do you balance utility and art?
- What is your value to a movement?
Another view
Some movements do claim to support artists explicitly.
More from Wilfrid Sheed
The rational man may talk a good game about suicide, but reason must give way to obsession and finally squalor before he can actually do it.
Permalink to quote #11 Censors will try to censor a little bit more each year (because, like editors and other officious people, censors don't feel they are getting anywhere unless t…
Permalink to quote #13 The desire not to destroy the palace but to move into it oneself has always been the occupational curse of revolutionaries.
Permalink to quote #10
Related quotes
What life means to me is to put the content of Shelley into the form of Zola. The proletarian writer is a writer with a purpose; he thinks no more of 'art for …
Upton SinclairUpton Sinclair quote #1 I live in the USSR, work actively and count naturally on the worker and peasant spectator. If I am not comprehensible to them I should be deported.
Dmitri ShostakovichDmitri Shostakovich quote #1 We had a dim premonition that power-mad gangsters would one day use art itself as a way of deadening men's minds.
Hans ArpHans Arp quote #1