Skip to content
quotesby

About this quote

What does it mean?
The author criticizes the term 'Jungian Psychology' as sectarian, acknowledging only Jung's contribution to general unconscious psychology.
In plain terms
Calling it Jungian Psychology is too narrow; Jung helped general psychology instead.
What can you take from it?
Avoid sectarian labels in favor of broader scientific contributions.

Where it applies

  • academic labeling
  • scientific categorization
  • field definition

Putting it to work

  • use general terms
  • avoid labels
  • broaden scope

Questions to consider

  • When does a label help or hurt science?
  • How should we name fields?

Another view

Specific names can still be useful for identifying distinct schools of thought.

More from Wolfgang Pauli

  1. It is always the older that emanates the new one.

    Permalink to quote #8
  2. There is no god and Dirac is his messenger. (German: Es gibt keinen Gott und Dirac ist sein Prophet.)

    Permalink to quote #10
  3. 'The fact of the existence of two theories [causal and acausal] that contradict each other in Jung ... corresponds psychologically to the vascillation between …

    Permalink to quote #7

Related quotes

  1. No one has ever proved that a human being, through his descent from a certain group of people, must of necessity have certain mental characteristics.

    Franz BoasFranz Boas quote #3
  2. When one analyzes the pre-conscious step to concepts, one always finds ideas which consist of 'symbolic images.' The first step to thinking is a painted vision…

    Wolfgang PauliWolfgang Pauli quote #4
  3. Every phenomenon can be experienced in two ways. These two ways are not arbitrary, but are bound up with the phenomenon - developing out of its nature and char…

    Wassily KandinskyWassily Kandinsky quote #5