Using a point to show that a point is not a point is not as good as using a nonpoint to show that a point is not a point.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Using a point to deny a point is weaker than using a non‑point to deny it.
- In plain terms
- Proving something isn’t a point with a point is less effective than using something non‑pointful.
- What can you take from it?
- Choose appropriate concepts to challenge assumptions.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- When is a direct approach more persuasive?
- What non‑point concepts can you employ?
Another view
Sometimes direct evidence is clearer than indirect abstraction.
More from Zhuangzi
There is order in chaos, and certainty in doubt. The wise are guided by this order and certainty.
Permalink to quote #26 We cling to our own point of view, as though everything depended on it. Yet our opinions have no permanence; like autumn and winter, they gradually pass away.
Permalink to quote #28 To stop leaving tracks is easy. Not to walk upon the ground is hard.
Permalink to quote #25
Related quotes
'Logic is invincible because in order to combat logic it is necessary to use logic.'
Pierre BoutrouxPierre Boutroux quote #1 The arguments of the strong are valued more than the strongest arguments.
Rolim AmaroRolim Amaro quote #5 Fallacious and misleading arguments are most easily detected if set out in correct syllogistic form.
Immanuel KantImmanuel Kant quote #47