Right is not right; so is not so. If right were really right it would differ so clearly from not right that there would be no need for argument. If so were really so, it would differ so clearly from not so that there would be no need for argument.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- If right and wrong were truly distinct, there would be no need for argument; the existence of debate shows the concepts are not absolute.
- In plain terms
- The presence of argument shows that right and wrong are not completely clear.
- What can you take from it?
- Recognize that concepts like 'right' are often nuanced.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- When can arguments reveal deeper truth?
- How do we handle persistent disagreement?
Another view
Some moral truths may be objectively true despite disagreement.
More from Zhuangzi
How do I know that enjoying life is not a delusion? How do I know that in hating death we are not like people who got lost in early childhood and do not know t…
Permalink to quote #2 Forget the years, forget distinctions. Leap into the boundless and make it your home!
Permalink to quote #4 Once upon a time, I, Chuang Chou, dreamt I was a butterfly, fluttering hither and thither, to all intents and purposes a butterfly. I was conscious only of my …
Permalink to quote #1
Related quotes
'Logic is invincible because in order to combat logic it is necessary to use logic.'
Pierre BoutrouxPierre Boutroux quote #1 Sonja: Boris, Let me show you how absurd your position is. Let's say there is no God, and each man is free to do exactly as he chooses.What prevents you from m…
Woody AllenWoody Allen quote #36 If Nietzsche and Hegel serve as alibis to the masters of Dachau and Karaganda, that does not condemn their entire philosophy. But it does lead to the suspicion…
Albert CamusAlbert Camus quote #83