Before there were anthologies of quotations in the modern sense, medieval scholars compiled florilegia—Latin for “flowers of reading.” These were collections of excerpts from authoritative texts, primarily the Church Fathers, classical authors, and Scripture, organized by topic and intended for preachers, students, and writers who needed access to authoritative language on specific subjects. The florilegium was the medieval internet of quotation: a curated, searchable database of words that already carried weight.
What Florilegia Were For
Medieval writers quoted differently from modern writers. To quote an authority—Augustine, Jerome, Aristotle transmitted through Latin translation—was to invoke a kind of truth. The quote did not merely support an argument; it was evidence of what the argument stood on. The florilegium gave compilers access to this authorized language without requiring them to own or have read the original works. A preacher who cited Seneca on patience did not necessarily know Seneca; he may have known only the excerpt in his florilegium.
This system had consequences. Quotes were often truncated, paraphrased, or slightly altered in transmission. Attribution could be inaccurate. A saying might be attributed to Augustine that was actually from Tertullian, or to Aristotle that was actually from a late Roman commentator on Aristotle. The authority of the name was what mattered; the exact correspondence of text to source was secondary.
The Most Important Florilegia
Several florilegia were widely used across medieval Europe:
- The Sententiae of Peter Lombard (12th century) — primarily theological, became the standard theology textbook for centuries
- The Florilegium Gallicum (12th–13th century) — a large classical anthology that preserved excerpts of authors whose works were otherwise unavailable
- The Manipulus Florum of Thomas of Ireland (1306) — organized alphabetically by subject, over 6,000 excerpts, used by preachers across Europe for generations
The Legacy in Modern Quotation Practice
The florilegium tradition did not end with medieval scholarship. It feeds directly into the printed commonplace books of the Renaissance and early modern period, then into formal dictionaries of quotations like Bartlett’s (first published 1855) and the Oxford Dictionary of Quotations (1941). Every curated collection of quotations is, in a sense, a florilegium.
The problem the medieval compilers faced—how do you ensure accuracy when excerpting?—remains the central problem of quotation today. The internet has created a new kind of florilegium, one without editors or source-checking, in which misattributed quotes circulate with the same confidence as verified ones. The structural problem is identical to what faced a thirteenth-century friar compiling sermon notes; the scale is simply larger.
What This History Tells Us About Quotation
Quotation has always been about authority. We quote people because their words carry weight we want to borrow. The medieval scholar quoted Augustine because Augustine’s name elevated an argument. A contemporary writer quotes Einstein for the same reason. The desire for an authoritative voice behind a compelling sentence is not a modern pathology; it is one of the oldest habits of intellectual life, and the florilegium tradition makes that visible in a way that the modern quote-checking industry rarely acknowledges.
Related reading: preserving personal stories and memories.