Can a society in which thought and technique are scientific persist for a long period, as, for example, ancient Egypt persisted, or does it necessarily contain within itself forces which must bring either decay or explosion?
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- He questions whether a scientifically driven society can endure or will inevitably collapse or explode.
- In plain terms
- A scientific society may be short‑lived or self‑destructive.
- What can you take from it?
- Beware of internal forces that could destabilize a scientific civilization.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- What mechanisms can sustain a scientific society long‑term?
- Can cultural factors override scientific decay?
Another view
No concrete evidence is given that scientific societies must fail.
More from Bertrand Russell
I do not believe that I am now dreaming, but I cannot prove that I am not. I am, however, quite certain that I am having certain experiences, whether they be t…
Permalink to quote #36 All who are not lunatics are agreed about certain things. That it is better to be alive than dead, better to be adequately fed than starved, better to be free …
Permalink to quote #38 Whatever we know without inference is mental.
Permalink to quote #35
Related quotes
Doctor Labyrinth, like most people who read a great deal and who have too much time on their hands, had become convinced that our civilization was going the wa…
Philip Kindred DickPhilip Kindred Dick quote #2 History, like a vast river, propels logs, vegetation, rafts, and debris; it is full of live and dead things, some destined for resurrection; it mingles many wa…
Jacques BarzunJacques Barzun quote #11 We'll look back and wonder who were these barbarous people, just like we look back at those who supported bull-baiting
Tony BanksTony Banks quote #12