Why do comparisons of words and tone poems (poetry and music) never take into consideration that the word is a mere signifier, but that the sound, aside from being a signifier, is also an object?
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- The author questions why comparisons between poetry and music ignore that words are signs while sounds are physical objects.
- In plain terms
- People comparing words and music forget that sounds exist as physical objects too.
- What can you take from it?
- Consider the physical nature of sound when analyzing art forms.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- How does sound function differently from language?
- Is art just signs or physical too?
Another view
Not all art comparisons require such technical distinctions.
More from Franz Grillparzer
Let the famous not denounce fame. Far from being empty and meaningless, it fills those it touches with divine power.
Permalink to quote #1 When mundane, lowly activities are at stake, too much insight is detrimental-far-sightedness errs in immediate concerns.
Permalink to quote #3 I'd wish the government took honest people into consideration, it shows enough consideration for scoundrels.
Permalink to quote #4
Related quotes
In poetry there are two giants, rough Homer and fine Shakespere. In music likewise we have two giants, Beethoven, the thinker, and the superthinker Berlioz.
Modest MussorgskyModest Mussorgsky quote #2 Alas, this industrialized twelve-tone horse, dull on the outside and empty inside, constantly being perfected and dragged to a new Troy in shadow of an ideolog…
Luciano BerioLuciano Berio quote #2 Cyn rheitied i mi brydu Ag i tithau bregethu, A chyn iawned ym glera Ag I tithau gardota. Pand englynion ac odlau Yw'r hymnau a'r segwensiau? A chywyddau i Ddu…
Dafydd ap GwilymDafydd ap Gwilym quote #2