Firstly what does conservation mean? It is not merely the saving from extinction of such species as the Notornis, the Leadbetters Possum or the Leathery Turtle; this is important work but it is only part of the problem. You cannot begin to preserve any species of animal unless you preserve the habitat in which it dwells. Disturb or destroy that habitat and you will exterminate the species as surely as if you had shot it. So conservation means that you have to preserve forest and grassland, river and lake, even the sea itself. This is not only vital for the preservation of animal life generally, but for the future existence of man himself - a point that seems to escape many people. We have inherited an incredibly beautiful and complex garden, but the trouble is that we have been appallingly bad gardeners. We have not bothered to acquaint ourselves with the simplest principles of gardening. By neglecting our garden, we are storing up for ourselves, in the not very distant future, a world catastrophe as bad as any atomic war, and we are doing it with all the bland complacency of an idiot child chopping up a Rembrandt with a pair of scissors. We go on, year after year, all over the world, creating dust bowls and erosion, cutting down forests and overgrazing our grasslands, polluting one of our most vital commodities - water - with industrial filth and all the time we are breeding with the ferocity of the Brown Rat, and wondering why there is not enough food to go round. We now stand so aloof from nature that we think we are God. This has always been a dangerous supposition. The attitude of the average person to the world they live in is completely selfish. When I take people round to see my animals, one of the first questions they ask (unless the animal is cute and appealing) is, 'what use is it?' by which they mean, 'what use is it to them?' To this one can reply 'What use is the Acropolis?' Does a creature have to be of direct material use to mankind in order to exist? By and large, by asking the question 'what use is it?' you are asking the animal to justify its existence without having justified your own.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Conservation requires protecting habitats, not just species, because destroying habitat kills species as surely as hunting.
- In plain terms
- You must save the land and homes animals live in, not just the animals.
- What can you take from it?
- Protecting habitat is essential for saving any species.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Why do people ignore habitats?
- How can we improve stewardship?
Another view
It simplifies the complex economic trade-offs of habitat preservation.
More from Gerald Durrell
So, until we consider animal life to be worthy of the consideration and reverence we bestow upon old books and pictures and historic monuments, there will alwa…
Permalink to quote #6 An immensely tall, angular figure ... His gown hung round him in long folds like the wings of a bat, and his wig was perched slightly askew over a lantern jawe…
Permalink to quote #8 We all travelled light, taking with us only what we considered to be the bare essentials of life. When we opened our luggage for Customs inspection, the conten…
Permalink to quote #5
Related quotes
My job is to save the fucking wilderness. I don't know anything else worth saving.
Edward AbbeyEdward Abbey quote #1 Few are altogether deaf to the preaching of pine trees. Their sermons on the mountains go to our hearts; and if people in general could be got into the woods, …
John MuirJohn Muir quote #8 The love of wilderness is more than a hunger for what is always beyond reach; it is also an expression of loyalty to the earth, the earth which bore us and sus…
Edward AbbeyEdward Abbey quote #24