I found it peculiar that those who wanted to take military action could - with 100 per cent certainty - know that the weapons existed and turn out to have zero knowledge of where they were.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Highlights the contradiction between certainty about weapon existence and ignorance of their location.
- In plain terms
- How can you know weapons exist but not where they are?
- What can you take from it?
- Absolute certainty without specific evidence is logically inconsistent.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- What counts as proof?
- Can you know something exists without knowing where?
Another view
Intelligence can be reliable about existence while lacking location data.
More from Hans Blix
It was to do with information management. The intention was to dramatise it.
Permalink to quote #1 I have my detractors in Washington. There are bastards who spread things around, of course, who planted nasty things in the media.
Permalink to quote #3 : there are people in this administration who say they don't care if the UN sinks under the East river, and other crude things:
Permalink to quote #4
Related quotes
'I don't think there is any doubt, if there ever was . . . that Saddam Hussein does have weapons of mass destruction. Biological weapons that they discovered w…
Paul MartinPaul Martin quote #6 [The Joint Intelligence Committee] concludes that Iraq has chemical and biological weapons, that Saddam has continued to produce them, that he has existing and…
Tony BlairTony Blair quote #28 We are asked now seriously to accept that in the last few years-contrary to all history, contrary to all intelligence-Saddam decided unilaterally to destroy th…
Tony BlairTony Blair quote #32