We are asked now seriously to accept that in the last few years-contrary to all history, contrary to all intelligence-Saddam decided unilaterally to destroy those weapons. I say that such a claim is palpably absurd.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Blair rejects the claim that Saddam Hussein unilaterally destroyed weapons, calling it absurd.
- In plain terms
- He says it is absurd to claim Saddam destroyed weapons on his own.
- What can you take from it?
- Historical and intelligence evidence should guide assertions about weapons.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- What evidence supports such claims?
- How do we verify weapon status?
Another view
Dismissive language can shut down necessary scrutiny.
More from Tony Blair
If we don't act now, we can't keep those people down there forever. We can't wait forever. If we don't act now, then we will go back to what has happened befor…
Permalink to quote #31 This is the time not just for this Government-or, indeed, for this Prime Minister-but for this House to give a lead: to show that we will stand up for what we …
Permalink to quote #33 The intelligence is clear: [Saddam Hussein] continues to believe that his weapons of mass destruction programme is essential both for internal repression and f…
Permalink to quote #30
Related quotes
'I don't think there is any doubt, if there ever was . . . that Saddam Hussein does have weapons of mass destruction. Biological weapons that they discovered w…
Paul MartinPaul Martin quote #6 Russia does not have in its possession any trustworthy data that supports the existence of nuclear weapons or any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and we ha…
Vladimir PutinVladimir Putin quote #1 I found it peculiar that those who wanted to take military action could - with 100 per cent certainty - know that the weapons existed and turn out to have zero…
Hans BlixHans Blix quote #2