The most dangerous and reprehensible type of all opportunists, someone who would use a Hitler for his own ends, and then claim, after Hitler was defeated, to have been against him all the time. He was part of a movement that he knew was wrong, but was in it just because he saw it was winning.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Schacht is criticized as an opportunist who supported a winning wrong movement then claimed opposition.
- In plain terms
- An opportunist supports a winner then claims to be against them.
- What can you take from it?
- Changing sides for safety damages credibility.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- When is changing sides acceptable?
- How do we judge political survival?
Another view
Survival sometimes requires tactical shifts that look like opportunism.
More from Hjalmar Schacht
He seems unable to brook any criticism or challenging of his stories or statements. My comments from time to time, my obvious failure to be convinced of his co…
Permalink to quote #11 It was Schacht, the facade of starched respectability, who in the early days provided the window dressing, the bait for the hesitant, and whose wizardry later …
Permalink to quote #13 Schacht is a disappointment because of another thing. If I would have had the terrible secrets of crimes committed by the Nazis in my hands, which Schacht said…
Permalink to quote #10
Related quotes
[Alan Cranston] understood power not as a reflection of status but as a tool with a purpose.' - Sen. Joseph Biden December 31, 2000 on Meet the Press
Alan CranstonAlan Cranston quote #1 The problem of power is how to achieve its responsible use rather than its irresponsible and indulgent use - of how to get men of power to live for the public …
Robert F. KennedyRobert F. Kennedy quote #1 Idque apud imperitos humanitas vocabatur, cum pars servitutis esset.
TacitusTacitus quote #1