Do we want blanks, asterisks and exclamation marks which people can fill in with their own imaginations, or are we prepared and strong enough to tolerate, even if we do not approve, the strong Anglo-Saxon, realistic and vivid language?
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Artists face a choice between vague placeholders that invite imagination or vivid explicit language that challenges tolerance.
- In plain terms
- Should art leave blanks for us to fill or use strong real words?
- What can you take from it?
- Explicit language tests our tolerance more than vague hints.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Do you prefer subtle or explicit art?
- Where do you draw the line on language?
Another view
Vague language can also be powerful and does not always imply censorship.
More from John Mortimer
We wondered why we ever thought there was, during the Cold War, any serious danger of Russia conquering the world when they couldn't even deliver the scenery f…
Permalink to quote #14 Television is one of the few things that works well in this country. This must be why the government has decided to destroy it.
Permalink to quote #16 The 'medium is the message' is one of the world's silliest remarks. The message is the message, and it doesn't matter whether you send it by e-mail, a note in …
Permalink to quote #13
Related quotes
Tout silence n'est fait que de paroles qu'on n'a pas dites. C'est pour cela peut-etre que je devins un musicien. Il fallait quelqu'un pour exprimer ce silence,…
Marguerite YourcenarMarguerite Yourcenar quote #1 If I could express the same thing with words as with music, I would, of course, use a verbal expression. Music is something autonomous and much richer. Music b…
Jean SibeliusJean Sibelius quote #3 'The over-publicized bit about expression (or non-expression) was simply a way of saying that music is supra-personal and super-real and as such beyond verbal …
Igor StravinskyIgor Stravinsky quote #6