Skip to content
quotesby

The partisans of aesthetic theory denied that it was their own invention, and professed that it existed in the nature of things and even that it was recognized by the ancient Greeks. But... among the ancient Greeks, due to their low grade (compared to the Christian) moral ideal, their conception of the good was not yet sharply distinguished from their conception of the beautiful. That highest conception of goodness (not identical with beauty and for the most part, contrasting with it) discerned by the Jews even in the time of Isaiah and fully expressed by Christianity, was unknown to the Greeks. It is true that the Greek's foremost thinkers - Socrates, Plato, Aristotle - felt that goodness may not coincide with beauty. ...But notwithstanding all this, they could not quite dismiss the notion that beauty and goodness coincide. And consequently in the language of that period a compound word (????-???????, beauty-goodness) came into use to express that notion. Evidently the Greek sages began to draw close to the perception of goodness which is expressed in Buddhism and in Christianity, but they got entangled in defining the relationship between goodness and beauty. And it was just this confusion of ideas that those Europeans of a later age...tried to elevate into law. ...On this misunderstanding the new science of aesthetics was built.

Leo Tolstoy#71

MoralityTolstoyPhilosophyAestheticsAesthetic theory

About this quote

What does it mean?
Tolstoy says aesthetic theorists claimed ancient Greeks distinguished beauty and goodness, but Greeks often saw them as coinciding, unlike Christians who separated them.
In plain terms
People say Greeks knew beauty and goodness were different, but Tolstoy argues Greeks mostly saw them as the same, unlike later Christian views.
What can you take from it?
Ancient Greeks often conflated beauty and goodness, contrary to aesthetic theory claims.

Where it applies

  • comparing greek and christian thought
  • studying aesthetic origins

Putting it to work

  • verify greek aesthetic claims
  • compare moral frameworks

Questions to consider

  • Did ancient cultures separate beauty from morality?
  • How do we interpret ancient texts today?

Another view

This generalization about Greek thought overlooks nuances in Socrates and Plato's actual writings.

More from Leo Tolstoy

  1. ...having acknowledged the measure of the good to be pleasure, i.e., beauty, the European upper classes went back in their comprehension of art to the gross co…

    Permalink to quote #70
  2. After Plotinus, says Schassler, fifteen centuries passed without the slightest scientific interest for the world of beauty and art. ...In reality, nothing of t…

    Permalink to quote #72
  3. So the majority of the highest classes of that age. even the popes and ecclesiastics, really believed in nothing at all. They did not believe in the Church doc…

    Permalink to quote #69

Related quotes

  1. ...having acknowledged the measure of the good to be pleasure, i.e., beauty, the European upper classes went back in their comprehension of art to the gross co…

    Leo TolstoyLeo Tolstoy quote #70
  2. What is beautiful is moral, that is all there is to it.

    Gustave FlaubertGustave Flaubert quote #16
  3. After Plotinus, says Schassler, fifteen centuries passed without the slightest scientific interest for the world of beauty and art. ...In reality, nothing of t…

    Leo TolstoyLeo Tolstoy quote #72