[George W.] Bush explained that he wasn't willing to take the steps outlined in the Kyoto accords - steps that both the scientific world and the international political community had agreed, with a stunning degree of unanimity, were necessary for the future viability of the earth - because he wasn't willing to jeopardize the rate of growth of the American economy. In what sense is this a rational position?
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Protecting economic growth was prioritized over environmental necessity in climate policy.
- In plain terms
- Economy was saved over the planet despite scientific advice.
- What can you take from it?
- Growth often overrides environmental protection.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Is economic growth more important than environmental survival?
Another view
Some argue economic stability is needed before addressing climate.
More from Linda McQuaig
Those tempted to slough off the helpful role of the state [in the earning of private property] should... 'compare the fortune accumulated by Cornelius Vanderbi…
Permalink to quote #5 All our confidence in our ability to act collectively is being undermined, with the subtext message Whatever it is, the private sector can do it better. Never …
Permalink to quote #7 Despite loud complaints from members of the financial elite about high tax levels, it's interesting to note that they still manage to live in the finest houses…
Permalink to quote #4
Related quotes
He won't take the lead in protecting the environment and creating new jobs in environmental technologies for the 21st century, but I will. And you know what el…
Bill ClintonBill Clinton quote #1 If we want to save our planet earth, we have a duty to put an end to the capitalist system.
Evo MoralesEvo Morales quote #1 A healthy environment is essential to a livable Oregon and a strong economy.
Ted KulongoskiTed Kulongoski quote #1