The US-UK would, doubtless, be as eager to draw their troops down in Iraq as Hitler was in occupied France and Norway, and the Russians were in Eastern Europe. And on the same condition. That local authorities will be able to ensure order and obedience to the master.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Chomsky compares US/UK troop withdrawals to other occupiers, noting they leave only when locals enforce obedience.
- In plain terms
- Troops leave when local rulers can keep order for the occupier.
- What can you take from it?
- Occupiers stay until control is secure.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Why do occupiers leave?
- How is order maintained?
Another view
It treats all occupation as permanent domination.
More from Noam Chomsky
After the invasion, there was sophisticated massive looting of the installations that were constructed in the 1980s - that includes high-precision equipment ca…
Permalink to quote #118 It should have been the easiest invasion in history, and the incompetence and arrogance of the Pentagon planners turned it into a total catastrophe. So yes, it…
Permalink to quote #120 I think murdering Iraqi union leaders is criminal, for example. And a lot of what the insurgents have done is criminal. But, you know, you rank the priorities.…
Permalink to quote #117
Related quotes
If I announce the armistice and the Americans don't send sufficient reinforcements and don't land near Rome, the Germans will seize the city and put in a puppe…
Pietro BadoglioPietro Badoglio quote #1 But in terms of Saddam Hussein being there, let's remember that his country is divided, in effect. He does not control the northern part of his country. We are…
Condoleezza RiceCondoleezza Rice quote #3 Limbaugh: What is the imperative for pulling out? What's in it for the United States to pull out? They, I don't think they have an answer for that other than, …
Rush LimbaughRush Limbaugh quote #48