Yet scientists are required to back up their claims not with private feelings but with publicly checkable evidence. Their experiments must have rigorous controls to eliminate spurious effects. And statistical analysis eliminates the suspicion (or at least measures the likelihood) that the apparent effect might have happened by chance alone.
ScienceTruthEvidenceMethodResearchScientific methodStatistics
Strict adherence to these standards can slow down useful but preliminary discoveries.
Scorpio could go retrograde up Uranus and it wouldn't make any difference.
Paranormal phenomena have a habit of going away whenever they are tested under rigorous conditions. This is why the ?740,000 reward of James Randi, offered to …
Scientific truth is too beautiful to be sacrificed for the sake of light entertainment or money. Astrology is an aesthetic affront. It cheapens astronomy, like…
When we seek a textbook case for the proper operation of science, the correction of certain error offers far more promise than the establishment of probable tr…
The truth may be puzzling. It may take some work to grapple with. It may be counterintuitive. It may contradict deeply held prejudices. It may not be consonant…
All interesting issues in natural history are questions of relative frequency, not single examples. Everything happens once amidst the richness of nature. But …