Although September 11 was horrible, it didn't threaten the survival of the human race, like nuclear weapons do.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- While 9/11 was a terrible event, it was not an existential threat to humanity like nuclear weapons are.
- In plain terms
- Nuclear weapons pose a greater risk to human survival than terrorism.
- What can you take from it?
- Distinguish between tragic events and true existential threats.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- What truly threatens human survival today?
- How do we prioritize global risks?
Another view
The quote simplifies complex security threats into a binary comparison.
More from Stephen Hawking
All of my life, I have been fascinated by the big questions that face us, and have tried to find scientific answers to them. Perhaps that is why I have sold mo…
Permalink to quote #7 I don't think the human race will survive the next thousand years, unless we spread into space. There are too many accidents that can befall life on a single p…
Permalink to quote #9 I don't believe that the ultimate theory will come by steady work along existing lines. We need something new. We can't predict what that will be or when we wi…
Permalink to quote #6
Related quotes
The fact that now we know well that there is proliferation of nuclear weapons and that many of the weapons that Saddam Hussein had, for example, we do not know…
Paul MartinPaul Martin quote #3 Nuclear proliferation is on the rise. Equipment, material and training were once largely inaccessible. Today, however, there is a sophisticated worldwide netwo…
Mohamed ElBaradeiMohamed ElBaradei quote #7 The mere existence of atomic weapons implies the possibility of their use.
Georgy ZhukovGeorgy Zhukov quote #10