Our indirect methods have taught us a mountain of things about horses, but if you wished to learn even more, would you rather be Whirlaway in the stretch, than interview Eddie Arcaro afterwards?
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Gould compares indirect knowledge to direct experience, preferring to be the horse in the race than to interview the jockey later.
- In plain terms
- It's better to experience something directly than to hear about it secondhand.
- What can you take from it?
- Value direct experience over indirect accounts.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- When is indirect knowledge enough?
- Is experience always better?
Another view
Sometimes indirect methods are safer or more practical than direct ones.
More from Stephen Jay Gould
I have a great respect for religion, and the subject has always fascinated me [:]. Much of this fascination lies in the stunning historical paradox that organi…
Permalink to quote #146 I am willing to believe that my unobtainable sixty seconds within a sponge or a flatworm might not reveal any mental acuity that I would care to call conscious…
Permalink to quote #148 When puzzled, it never hurts to read the primary documents-a rather simple and self-evident principle that has, nonetheless, completely disappeared from large …
Permalink to quote #145
Related quotes
One can judge from experiment, or one can blindly accept authority. To the scientific mind, experimental proof is all important and theory is merely a convenie…
Robert A. HeinleinRobert A. Heinlein quote #2 There does not exist a category of science to which one can give the name applied science. There are sciences and the applications of science, bound together a…
Louis PasteurLouis Pasteur quote #3 Every experiment destroys some of the knowledge of the system which was obtained by previous experiments.
Werner HeisenbergWerner Heisenberg quote #3