[I]f texts are unified by a central logic of argument, then their pictorial illustrations are integral to the ensemble, not pretty little trifles included only for aesthetic or commercial value. Primates are visual animals, and (particularly in science) illustration has a language and set of conventions all its own.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Illustrations are integral to scientific argument, not just decoration. Gould notes that visuals have their own conventions and importance.
- In plain terms
- Pictures in science are essential, not just pretty.
- What can you take from it?
- Value scientific illustrations as serious content.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- How do images shape science?
- Are visuals underused?
Another view
It assumes all audiences are visual learners.
More from Stephen Jay Gould
I despair of persuading people to drop the familiar and comforting tactic of dichotomy. Perhaps, instead, we might expand the framework of debates by seeking o…
Permalink to quote #53 I would trade all the advantages of humanity to be a fly on the wall when Franklin and Jefferson discussed liberty, Lenin and Trotsky revolution, Newton and Ha…
Permalink to quote #55 [S]cientists are not robotic inducing machines that infer structures of explanation only from regularities observed in natural phenomena (assuming, as I doubt,…
Permalink to quote #52
Related quotes
Un bon croquis vaut mieux qu'un long discours.
Napoleon BonaparteNapoleon Bonaparte quote #192 Differential equations won't help you much in the design of aeroplanes - not yet, anyhow.
Nevil ShuteNevil Shute quote #1 In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood by everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in the case of poetry, it's the…
Paul DiracPaul Dirac quote #2