I am not very impressed with theological arguments whatever they may be used to support. Such arguments have often been found unsatisfactory in the past. In the time of Galileo it was argued that the texts, 'And the sun stood still... and hasted not to go down about a whole day' (Joshua x. 13) and 'He laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not move at any time' (Psalm cv. 5) were an adequate refutation of the Copernican theory.

I believe that at the end of the century the use of words and general educated opinion will have altered so much that one will be able to speak of machines thi…

We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done.

The idea behind digital computers may be explained by saying that these machines are intended to carry out any operations which could be done by a human comput…

[Dinosaurs] didn't exist. God created the sun, the stars, the heavens and the earth, and then made Adam and Eve. The Bible never says anything about dinosaurs.…

In the absence of any other proof, the thumb alone would convince me of God's existence.

Within the scientific skeleton of truth, religious meaning attempts to flourish, often by denying the scientific framework itself - rather like sawing off the …