Taking this view of the matter, the Anarchists contend that defence is not an essential of the State, but that aggression is.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- According to Tucker, anarchists argue that aggression is essential to the state while defense is not.
- In plain terms
- The state is defined by aggression not defense.
- What can you take from it?
- Link the state inherently to aggression rather than protection.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Can a state exist without aggression?
- Is defense ever the sole reason for a state?
Another view
It may overlook cases where states form primarily for collective defense.
More from Benjamin Tucker
Defence was an afterthought, prompted by necessity; and its introduction as a State function, though effected doubtless with a view to the strengthening of the…
Permalink to quote #17 What relations should exist between the State and the Individual? The general method of determining these is to apply some theory of ethics involving a basis o…
Permalink to quote #19 This distinction between invasion and resistance, between government and defence, is vital. Without it there can be no valid philosophy of politics. Upon this …
Permalink to quote #16
Related quotes
This distinction between invasion and resistance, between government and defence, is vital. Without it there can be no valid philosophy of politics. Upon this …
Benjamin TuckerBenjamin Tucker quote #16 We designate by the term 'State' institutions that embody absolutism in its extreme form and institutions that temper it with more or less liberality. We apply…
Benjamin TuckerBenjamin Tucker quote #14 Let us then enunciate the functions of a state and we shall easily elicit what we want: First there must be food; secondly, arts, for life requires many instru…
AristotleAristotle quote #34