It's certainly true that the world is better off without Saddam Hussein, and also without the people who supported him through his worst atrocities, and are now telling us about them.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Chomsky argues that while removing Hussein was beneficial, the hypocrisy of his supporters now exposing his atrocities is problematic.
- In plain terms
- Removing a dictator helps, but those who backed his crimes shouldn't suddenly claim moral high ground.
- What can you take from it?
- Judge actions consistently, not just when convenient.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Who benefits when former allies expose past crimes?
- Does ending atrocities justify prior support?
Another view
The quote assumes readers agree Hussein was universally worse than the status quo.
More from Noam Chomsky
I think that the polls taken in Baghdad explain it very well, they seem to understand. The United States invaded Iraq to gain control of one of the major sourc…
Permalink to quote #113 The big debate in Washington is totally pointless. And the media, about whether Bush downgraded terror in order to invade Iraq. There's nothing to debate. He i…
Permalink to quote #115 In September [2002] the government announced the national security strategy. That is not completely without precedent, but it is quite new as a formulation of …
Permalink to quote #112
Related quotes
Iraq is an unjust war. (spoken on the Diane Rehm Show; stated in articles written for NY Times; printed in USA Today)
Jimmy CarterJimmy Carter quote #10 On what moral grounds can the rulers of a nation in which millionaires and beggars exist; Indians are exterminated; Blacks are discriminated against; women are…
Fidel CastroFidel Castro quote #12 Suppose Germany had developed two bombs before we had any bombs. And suppose Germany had dropped one bomb, say, on Rochester and the other on Buffalo, and then…
Leo SzilardLeo Szilard quote #1