Skip to content
quotesby

Thomas Jefferson, the leading Enlightenment figure in the United States, along with Benjamin Franklin, who took exactly the same view, argued that dependence will lead to 'subservience and venality', and will 'suffocate[s] the germs of virtue'. And remember, by dependence he meant wage labor, which was considered an abomination under classical liberal principles. There's a modern perversion of conservatism and libertarianism, which has changed the meanings of words, pretty much the way Orwell discussed. So nowadays, dependence refers to something else. When you listen to what's going in Congress, and people talk about dependence, what they mean by dependence is public support for hungry children, not wage labor. Dependence is support for hungry children and mothers who are caring for them. [...] We see this very dramatically right at this moment in Congress, under the leadership of Newt Gingrich, who quite demonstrably is the leading welfare freak in the country. He is the most avid advocate of welfare in the country, except he wants it to go to the rich. His own district in Cobb County Georgia gets more federal subsidies than any suburban county in the country, outside of the federal system itself... And it's supposed to continue, because this kind of welfare dependency is good. Dependent children, that's bad. But dependent executives, that's good. You gotta make sure they keep feeding at the public trough. [...] the nation is not an entity, it's divided into economic classes, and the architects of policy are those who have the economic power. In his days, he said, the merchants and manufacturers of England, who make sure that their interests are 'most peculiarly attended to', like Gingrich. Whatever the effect on others, including the people of England. To Adam Smith, that was a truism. To James Madison, that was a truism. Nowadays, you're supposed to recoil in horror and call it vulgar Marxism or something, meaning that Adam Smith and James Madison must have been disciples of Marx. And if you believe the rest of the story, you might as well believe that. But those are facts which you can easily discover if you bothered reading the sacred texts, that you're supposed to worship, but not read.

Noam Chomsky#6

PoliticsHistoryFreedomRightsLanguageConservatism

About this quote

What does it mean?
Classical liberals viewed wage labor as dependence, while modern conservatives target public support.
In plain terms
Old views defined dependence as wage labor.
What can you take from it?
Track how political terms change over time.

Where it applies

  • policy debate
  • historical analysis

Putting it to work

  • Define terms before debating
  • Study historical usage

Questions to consider

  • How has 'freedom' changed?
  • Which words are most politicized?

Another view

Not all terms shift maliciously.

More from Noam Chomsky

  1. In the United States, the political system is a very marginal affair. There are two parties, so-called, but they're really factions of the same party, the Busi…

    Permalink to quote #5
  2. I compared some passages of articles of [Robert McNamara] in the late 1960s, speeches, on management and the necessity of management, how a well-managed societ…

    Permalink to quote #7
  3. A lot of the people who call themselves Left I would regard as proto-fascists.

    Permalink to quote #4

Related quotes

  1. Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have ... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liber…

    Thomas JeffersonThomas Jefferson quote #214
  2. The individual who refuses to defend his rights when called by his Government, deserves to be a slave, and must be punished as an enemy of his country and frie…

    Andrew JacksonAndrew Jackson quote #1
  3. During the last 100 years, the House of Lords has never contributed one iota to popular liberties or popular freedom, or done anything to advance the common we…

    Joseph ChamberlainJoseph Chamberlain quote #1