Non-violent resistance activities cannot succeed against an enemy that is able freely to use violence. That's pretty obvious. You can't have non-violent resistance against the Nazis in a concentration camp, to take an extreme case...
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Non-violent resistance fails against enemies free to use violence, as seen in extreme cases like concentration camps.
- In plain terms
- Non-violent tactics don't work when enemies can freely use force.
- What can you take from it?
- Consider enemy capacity for violence before choosing resistance tactics.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Is non-violence ever sufficient?
- How to resist violent enemies?
Another view
Non-violent resistance can still succeed through moral pressure.
More from Noam Chomsky
Of course, everybody says they're for peace. Hitler was for peace. Everybody is for peace. The question is: what kind of peace?
Permalink to quote #67 Naturally, any conqueror is going to play one group against another. For example, I think about 90% of the forces that the British used to control India were I…
Permalink to quote #69 I would feel no hesitation in saying that it is the responsibility of a decent human being to give assistance to a child who is being attacked by a rabid dog, …
Permalink to quote #66
Related quotes
There are many people who feel that it is useless and futile for us to continue talking peace and non-violence - against a government whose only reply is savag…
Nelson MandelaNelson Mandela quote #1 Now if the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms comes to disarm you and they are bearing arms, resist them with arms. Go for a head shot; they're going to b…
G. Gordon LiddyG. Gordon Liddy quote #2 I am a person who has never used violence himself. My present opinion is that people who have obtained the ballot should use it and solve their problems in tha…
Upton SinclairUpton Sinclair quote #6