It is possible that the distinction between moral relativism and moral absolutism has sometimes been blurred because an excessively consistent practice of either leads to the same practical result - ruthlessness in political life.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Moral relativism and absolutism may blur because extreme consistency in either leads to ruthlessness in politics.
- In plain terms
- Extreme moral beliefs can lead to the same harsh outcomes.
- What can you take from it?
- Rigid moral systems can produce similar negative real behaviors.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Can ethics guide politics?
- Is consistency always good?
Another view
This assumes both extremes are equally prone to ruthlessness.
More from Richard Hofstadter
While early American society was an agrarian society, it was fast becoming more commercial, and commercial goals made their way among its agricultural classes …
Permalink to quote #2 Out of the beliefs nourished by the agrarian myth there had arisen the notion that the city was a parasitical growth on the country. Bryan spoke for a people r…
Permalink to quote #3 The American farmer, whose holdings were not so extensive as those of the grandee nor so tiny as those of the peasant, whose psychology was Protestant and bour…
Permalink to quote #4
Related quotes
A means can be justified only by its end. But the end in its turn needs to be justified. (Also quoted as 'The end may justify the means as long as there is som…
Leon TrotskyLeon Trotsky quote #6 'In the abstract conception of universal wrong, all concrete responsibility vanishes.'
Theodor AdornoTheodor Adorno quote #45 The Benthamic standard of 'the greatest happiness' was that which I had always been taught to apply; I was even familiar with an abstract discussion of it, for…
John Stuart MillJohn Stuart Mill quote #64