Eugene Dubois is no hero in my book, if only because I share the spirit of his unorthodoxies, but disagree so strongly with his version, and regard his supporting arguments as so weakly construed and so willfully blind to opposing evidence (the dogmatist within is always worse than the enemy without).
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Gould criticizes Eugene Dubois for ignoring opposing evidence and being dogmatic in his arguments.
- In plain terms
- Dubois ignored facts that disagreed with his ideas which makes him unheroic.
- What can you take from it?
- Do not ignore evidence that contradicts your theories.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- When is dogmatism worse than the enemy?
- How do we judge historical scientists?
Another view
Unorthodox ideas sometimes require strong initial conviction to be heard.
More from Stephen Jay Gould
The truly awesome intellectuals in our history have not merely made discoveries; they have woven variegated, but firm, tapestries of comprehensive coverage. Th…
Permalink to quote #103 Good scholars struggle to understand the world in an integral way (pedants bite off tiny bits and worry them to death). These visions of reality [:] demand our…
Permalink to quote #105 Bacteria represent the world's greatest success story. They are today and have always been the modal organisms on earth; they cannot be nuked to oblivion and w…
Permalink to quote #102
Related quotes
I am not very impressed with theological arguments whatever they may be used to support. Such arguments have often been found unsatisfactory in the past. In th…
Alan TuringAlan Turing quote #7 The criterion which we use to test the genuineness of apparent statements of fact is the criterion of verifiability. We say that a sentence is factually signif…
Alfred AyerAlfred Ayer quote #1 Although the problem of transmuting chemical elements into each other is much older than a satisfactory definition of the very concept of chemical element, it …
Enrico FermiEnrico Fermi quote #1