Property rights are not like other rights, contrary to what Madison and a lot of modern political theory says. If I have the right to free speech, it doesn't interfere with your right to free speech. But if I have property, that interferes with your right to have that property, you don't have it, I have it. So the right to property is very different from the right to freedom of speech. This is often put very misleadingly about rights of property; property has no right. But if we just make sense out of this, maybe there is a right to property, one could debate that, but it's very different from other rights.

Ricardo's 'science' was founded on the principle that capital is more or less immobile and labor highly mobile. We are enjoined today to worship the consequenc…

I should say that when people talk about capitalism it's a bit of a joke. There's no such thing. No country, no business class, has ever been willing to subjec…

Modern industrial civilization has developed within a certain system of convenient myths. The driving force of modern industrial civilization has been individu…

It is often said that the Arabs fled, that they left the country voluntarily, and that they therefore bear the responsibility for losing their property and the…

Dew depends not on Parliament.

There is nothing which so generally strikes the imagination, and engages the affections of mankind, as the right of property; or that sole and despotic dominio…