Armies usually aren't interested in wars. They like preparation for war. But they have an understandable reluctance to fight a war. So I think if you look at, at least the history that I know, it's usually the civilian leadership who is pushing the military to do something. It was the case in the early days of the Vietnam War.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Armies prefer war preparation but hesitate to fight; civilian leadership often pushes military into conflict, as in Vietnam.
- In plain terms
- Military leaders often resist fighting; civilians push them to war.
- What can you take from it?
- Recognize civilian leadership's role in initiating conflicts.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Who really starts wars?
- Why do militaries hesitate?
Another view
Military leadership can also advocate for conflict.
More from Noam Chomsky
Actually, on humanitarian intervention in general, I guess my view is not unlike the view that was attributed to Gandhi, accurately or not, when he was suppose…
Permalink to quote #71 We cannot say much about human affairs with any confidence, but sometimes it is possible. We can, for example, be fairly confident that either there will be a …
Permalink to quote #73 A good way of finding out who won a war, who lost a war, and what the war was about, is to ask who's cheering and who's depressed after it's over - this can gi…
Permalink to quote #70
Related quotes
When Mussolini decided on war he did not take my advice or that of any other Army chief. In August 1939 the Duce had not been so sure about the invincibility o…
Pietro BadoglioPietro Badoglio quote #8 As Iraqi forces gain experience and the political process advances, we will be able to decrease our troop level in Iraq without losing our capability to defeat…
George W. BushGeorge W. Bush quote #195 Canada's position was Saddam Hussein should be disarmed. Now, to be quite honest, I had a lot of difficulty understanding how he was going to be disarmed witho…
Paul MartinPaul Martin quote #1